the protection of the marks

The soci? T? 2L Multim? dia, which exploits a site D? name? “Does Easy Meet” attack for competition D? honest and parasitic the soci? T? Meetic to have revealed a commercial bond towards the site “Ulteem.fr” at the time of a research on word-Cl? S “easy meets” in the search engine Yahoo.

Since a few year? be, the search engines propose to the holders sites D? to obtain a better classification in the R? sultats of research by realising L? purchase of words Cl? S so D? will appara? tre in the form of short advertisements comprising L? addresses their Internet sites (or a bond towards these sites) on the page of R? sultats of the research of the engine in a framework or a stringcourse intitul? ” commercial bond “.

Some are so satisfied D? acqu? to rir will words of the language running to make appara? tre L? announces their sites in top of the R? sultats matter? S by the engine? L? Net surfer, D? others ach? tent word-Cl? S corresponding to the marks of their competitors (it is the case here).

The ordinance of R? F? R? returned on May 4, 2007 by Pr? sident Commercial court of Paris asks the suppr? does Sion of the commercial bond but let plane the doubt as? the compr? hension of the litigation by the magistrate? such an amount of gift? many erreures in its D? cision.

M? me if the advertisers are indeed a long time trouv? S? trangement absent from these litigations, a arr? T of D? cembre 2004 (TGI of Nanterre, 14 D? cembre 2004, CNRRH, Pierre Alexis T. against do Google France and others) have for the premi? Re time condamn? advertisers with C? T? search engine for contrefa? one of marks and competition D? honest.
Source: ddg.fr

to see the articles Pr? yield: Commercial bonds sanction? S by the contrefa? ON and The question of the commercial bonds always divide the judges