Events, Rumours, E-reputation

Two formations on HT? me of D? fense of the mark on Internet

Within sight of the number of formations, conf? rences, of articles on HT? me of slandering, D? nigrement, of the reputaion management… of the protection of the mark in G? N? ral since whatever weeks, it should be believed that a request Cr?? E and that companies (or personnalit? S!) begin S? rieusement? int? resser? their image on Internet!

The premi? does Re formation take place next May 6? Is Paris, it organis? E by the law firm ULYS, and the soci? T? KROLL ONTRACK. HT? me of the formation is: Slandering, D? nigrement, and right of R? ponse: which protection of L? company on Internet
More infos

Second A place on June 19? Paris (well S? R!), it is organis? E by Legiteam. HT? me of the formation is:D? fense of the mark and the public image of the company on Internet
More infos

Objetifs of this second formation:

1. D? to finish the relevant legal tools:

- Which is the current position of jurisprudence on the parody of mark, the slandering of the persons or entities and D? nigrement products,
- Can the companies they Pr? to tend? the protection of their image and their public image?
- In which hypoth? its is D owed? to split the R? putation of a person or entity and in which case to act for the only protection of the products and services?

2. To identify the diff? rents responsible and conna? tre R? gimes of responsabilit? correspondents:

- The large ones? volutions of jurisprudence, since the entr? E in force of the law of July 21, 2004 on confidence in? conomy num? ric,
-? can ditor of an Internet site? tre also H? bergor of certain contents?
- Which obligations p? feels on the company when it wishes to obtain the removal of contents, and in which cases to engage the responsabilit? de l’h?bergeur ?
- Dans quels cas le r?gime sp?cifique de la responsabilit? des producteurs devra-t-il ?tre appliqu? ?
- Qui peut-?tre d?clar? ?diteur d’un site internet ?
- Quels contr?les du contenu ?ditorial exiger de celui-ci ?
- Quelles cons?quences en tirer ?

3. Am?liorer la gestion de la proc?dure :

- Quelles pr?cautions prendre pour la protection de la preuve ?
- Conduire le proc?s de presse : conna?tre les d?lais sp?cifiques de la proc?dure, anticiper la contre-offre de preuve, g?rer au mieux la prescription, interroger les t?moins cit?s,
- D?finir la proc?dure ad?quate compte tenu des caract?ristiques de l’atteinte ? l’image de marque subie par l’entreprise,
- Ma?triser les r?gles essentielles des conflits de juridictions et de conflits de lois, au regard des derniers d?veloppements de la jurisprudence notamment en mati?re de contrefa?on de marque.

4. G?rer une crise de communication :

- Comment pr?parer un droit de r?ponse sur internet ?
- Comment obtenir la suppression en r?f?r? d’un contenu illicite ?
- Comment communiquer en interne sur les atteintes dont l’entreprise est l’objet lorsque celle-ci ?mane d’un salari? ou ont une source externe ?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • blogmarks
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Live
  • Print this article!
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio
  • Wikio FR

1 Commentaire

Exprimez Vous

Ajoutez votre commentaire ci-dessous, ou faites un Rétrolien depuis votre propre site.

Souscrire à ces commentaires.

Soyez sympas. Gardez la page propre. Restez sur le sujet. Pas de spam.

Vous pouvez utiliser ces tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*Champs Requis