the protection of the marks

When Google has D? tect? does a site like dangerous, the search engine affix under the title of the R? sultats of research the message following: “This site is likely to damage your computer”. It would have m? me, in certain cases, bloqu? the acc? S with the suspect site.

Aquatour.com, propri? T? of Thomascook.fr, made the expenses of the R? cente political of Google in mati? Re of S? curit? and thus D wishes? sormais to ask R? paration of Pr? judice undergone.

It is about a Pr? judice ? the mark. The fact of affirming with the Net surfers whom they do expose? risks by visiting our site is D? nigrement from a point of view L? Gall” [...] “We put this business between the hands of our lawyers. Does Google have to assume the idiots? quences of its acts”.

explain Laurent Dup? , directing marketing of ThomasCook.

Would the site of holidays have retrouv? its usual description since April 21.

Explanations of google
Explanations of Google on the choice of the sites consid? R? S as dangerous remain rather fuzzy:

“This process of identification is inspired partly by the instructions D? finished by StopBadware.org“

Rem? dier with the probl? me

“You can ask for the R? examination of your site if you estimate what it has? T? wrongfully identifi? like? such an amount of a site H? bergeant or diffusing malevolent software, if you do have contribution? modifications N? cessaires so that it out of H? doesn't bank and diffuse any any more, or if you have S? curis? your site so that it Pr? feels more faults”, Pr? cise Google in sound Center of assistance Administrateur Web of Google.

1. Do you connect to the Tools for the webmasters? assistance of your Google account.
2. On the dashboard, click on To ask the R? examination in the list Tools being in the right part of? notch, then follow the provided instructions.

If we arrive then? us to ensure that your site H? doesn't bank nor diffuse any more malevolent software, we will remove the mention then the identifier like such in the R? sultats of research.

J’esp?re que les raisons pour lesquelles Google d?termine un site comme dangereux sont purement objectives et scientifiques et qu’elles ne puissent r?sulter de d?cisions discr?tionnaires ou de d?nonciations.

Souce : le JDN